Comments
There's unfortunately not much to read here yet...
Best of Machine Learning
Discover the best guides, books, papers and news in Machine Learning, once per week.
Follow the full discussion on Reddit.
I am trying to reimplement the original GAN paper by Ian Goodfellow et al. And I need to show that my implementation achieves same or similar results as the authors achieved. But I am not sure how to evaluate this metric. I took a look at their implementation but I got some funny results. In the paper they report 225 +- 2 on the MNIST for this metric, while the results I get are bellow -400000000. I thought that maybe the model is bad, but it generates really good images of MNIST digits.
There's unfortunately not much to read here yet...
Ever having issues keeping up with everything that's going on in Machine Learning? That's where we help. We're sending out a weekly digest, highlighting the Best of Machine Learning.
Best of Machine Learning
Discover the best guides, books, papers and news in Machine Learning, once per week.
Join 800 others in curating the best parts of Machine Learning!
Just one more step. We use social logins to make sure that real humans are curating the list!
or contribute on GitHub directly.